Washington Legal Defense
Free Consultation
Claim Filing Amendment Get 150+ Years of Combined Litigation Experience on Your Side
Hester Law Group

Claim Filing Amendment

As most of you know, before you file a lawsuit against a government entity, there is a claim filing prerequisite. The statutes for this are set forth at RCW 4.92.100, 4.92.110, 4.96.010 and 4.96.020. What you may not know, however, is that on June 6, 2006, these statutes were amended to require someone who is suing an individual officer, employee or agent of a governmental entity for conduct that is actionable, to specify the individual or individuals in the claim. These statutes became effective on June 7, 2006, and for all cases filed after that date, the specific parties must be named in the Notice of Claim and served or they will likely be dismissed from any lawsuit.

Theoretically, the purpose of the claims statute is to give the government entity advance notice of a potential case so that it might be resolved short of a lawsuit. However, as most of us know, aside from perhaps receiving an acknowledgment that the claim has been received, rarely is a case resolved at this stage. As such, before any meaningful discussion is held, a lawsuit must be filed.

The danger with the claim filing requirement is that the appellate courts when reviewing whether the claim is proper, have been very particular to make certain that the claim’s requirements are met. See Medina v. Public Utility Dist. No. 307, 147 Wn.2d 303, 53 P.3d 993 (2002); Troxell v. Rainier Public School Dist. No. 307, 154 Wn.2d 345, 111 P.3d 1173 (2005); Bosteder v. City of Renton, 155 Wash.2d 18, 117 P.3d 316 (2005). Substantial compliance is not enough and dismissals have been upheld on appeal when the claim has not been completed properly. Id.

Now that the amendment applies, if you are seeking to hold a particular person responsible, that person must be named in the claim and served in order to satisfy the claim filing prerequisite.

Upon reviewing the legislative history to SHB 2130, which addresses the claim notice requirements, the amendments specifically apply to “claims against officers, employees or volunteers of the state or local government when acting in that capacity.” Although no reported cases have been decided interpreting the new statutes, precedent suggests that unless you follow the statute precisely, you risk having your case dismissed because of this procedural issue. As such, when preparing your claim against a government entity, be diligent that all claim filing requirements are satisfied.


Success Stories

  • If he said he was going to do something he did it. He has integrity.

    “Wayne Fricke is a terrific lawyer who knows the law. The following are only several of many ways Mr. Fricke supported me during my time of crisis: 1. Explained the charges against me in a manner that ...”

    - Former Client
  • He always exceeds expectations.

    “Mr. Fricke has been our family lawyer for about 5 years. He has done an amazing job representing my family and I. He always exceeds expectations and informs us on everything going on.”

    - Jen
  • He, at no time, treated me as though I was guilty.

    “I was accused of domestic violence and need a Lawyer to defend me. Not knowing who to hire I started with Mr. K.W. This lawyer did not seem to believe in my innocence and I was looking at 3 to 5 ...”

    - Craig
  • Mr. Fricke had his office call me weekly for updates.

    “A few years ago, I was involved in a car accident. Due to my injuries, I hired an attorney who seemingly disappeared. I was in crisis after calling the court and finding out my case had been dismissed ...”

    - Sharyl
  • He is always honest and straight forward.

    “I hired Lance Hester to help me with 2 different legal matters. One was a felony criminal case and the other was a family law issue. In the felony criminal case this individual had everything to lose ...”

    - Former Client

Proven Results

  • Reduced Sentence Drug Crime
  • Case Dismissed Multiple Counts of Child Exploitation
  • Case Dismissed Domestic Violence
  • Four Felony Charges Dismissed Four Felony Counts
  • Reduced Sentence Drug Distribution
  • Vacated Conviction 4th Degree Assault
  • Case Dismissed Possession of Stolen Property
  • Two Restraining Orders Granted Anti-harassment Orders
  • Federal Court Success Federal Probation Violation
  • Case Dismissed Rape

Why Choose the Hester Law Group?

  • Accessible to Clients

    We understand the urgency clients have when they need an attorney. We are available  24/7 to help you.

  • We Truly Care

    We feel honored to help someone through the toughest time they will ever go through.

  • Personalized Approach

    At Hester Law Group, we use a personal approach that best suits the needs of our clients.

  • Unparalleled Experience

    We have been a successful team for two decades and have over 130 years of combined experience.

We're Available 24/7

Get Started on Your Defense Today
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.