Washington Legal Defense
Free Consultation
Search Warrant Requirements In The Era Of Social Media Get 150+ Years of Combined Litigation Experience on Your Side
Hester Law Group

Search Warrant Requirements in the Era of Social Media

Two recent and encouraging decisions, one from the United States Supreme Court and one from the Court of Appeals, Division III, illustrate that all is not lost in the fight against warrantless searches.  The facts in both cases are routine, and both Courts’ decisions warrant review.

Riley v. California, 134 S.Ct. 2473 (2014) is a consolidated case involving a decision from California and one from the First Circuit.  Both cases involved warrantless searches of cell phones incident to arrest.   On appeal, the California Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s denial of a suppression motion whereas the First Circuit reversed the denial of a suppression motion and vacated the relevant convictions.

 In granting certiorari, the Supreme Court reviewed the Fourth Amendment case law regarding warrantless searches and exceptions to the warrant requirement, in particular, the search incident to arrest exception and how it applies to cell phones.  The Court held that officers must generally obtain a warrant before searching a cell phone.  In its analysis, the Supreme Court considered the search incident to arrest rationale set forth in Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), which addressed the warrantless search exception when officer safety or possible destruction of evidence issues exist.  The Supreme Court held that police may not, without a warrant, search digital information from a cell phone seized from an individual incident to an arrest absent a specific exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement.

The facts in State v. Jardinez, (Nov. 18, 2014, Division III) are also straight forward.  Jardinez entered a guilty plea to a drive-by shooting and second degree unlawful possession of a firearm.  After serving prison time, he was required to report to his corrections officer and abide by his release conditions.  After Jardinez tested positive for marijuana, his corrections officer searched, without a warrant, the contents of Jardinez’s iPod Nano and found a video of Jardinez possessing a shotgun, another violation of his conditions.  After the shotgun he held in the video was found in his home, the State charged Jardinez with unlawful possession of a firearm.

The trial court granted Jardinez’s motion to suppress the warrantless search and ruled that there must be “a reasonable nexus between the suspected criminal activity and the search.”  On appeal, the State took the blanket approach that whenever a probation violation occurs, a warrantless search is authorized pursuant to RCW 9.94A.631(1) which authorizes searches by community corrections officers.  The Appellate Court disagreed and held that a nexus must first exist between the searched property and the alleged crime.  Since nothing about Jardinez’s use of marijuana was related to the iPod, the warrantless search was unlawful.

Both cases give hope that courts will not automatically affirm warrantless searches, and will, once again, protect the constitutional rights of individuals from the lawless acts of law enforcement officers, particularly when the search of electronics is at issue.

Categories
  • Washington Association for Justice
  • Tacoma-Pierce County Bar Association
  • American Board of Trial Advocates
  • American Association for Justice
  • Washington State Bar Association
  • Avvo 10.0 Rating

Success Stories

  • If he said he was going to do something he did it. He has integrity.

    “Wayne Fricke is a terrific lawyer who knows the law. The following are only several of many ways Mr. Fricke supported me during my time of crisis: 1. Explained the charges against me in a manner that ...”

    - Former Client
  • He always exceeds expectations.

    “Mr. Fricke has been our family lawyer for about 5 years. He has done an amazing job representing my family and I. He always exceeds expectations and informs us on everything going on.”

    - Jen
  • He, at no time, treated me as though I was guilty.

    “I was accused of domestic violence and need a Lawyer to defend me. Not knowing who to hire I started with Mr. K.W. This lawyer did not seem to believe in my innocence and I was looking at 3 to 5 ...”

    - Craig
  • Mr. Fricke had his office call me weekly for updates.

    “A few years ago, I was involved in a car accident. Due to my injuries, I hired an attorney who seemingly disappeared. I was in crisis after calling the court and finding out my case had been dismissed ...”

    - Sharyl
  • He is always honest and straight forward.

    “I hired Lance Hester to help me with 2 different legal matters. One was a felony criminal case and the other was a family law issue. In the felony criminal case this individual had everything to lose ...”

    - Former Client
/

Proven Results

  • Reduced Sentence Drug Crime
  • Case Dismissed Domestic Violence
  • Four Felony Charges Dismissed Four Felony Counts
  • Reduced Sentence Drug Distribution
  • Vacated Conviction 4th Degree Assault
  • Case Dismissed Possession of Stolen Property
  • Two Restraining Orders Granted Anti-harassment Orders
  • Federal Court Success Federal Probation Violation
  • Case Dismissed Rape
  • Life Sentence Avoided Federal Criminal Sex Charges
/

Why Choose the Hester Law Group?

  • Accessible to Clients

    We understand the urgency clients have when they need an attorney. We are available  24/7 to help you.

  • We Truly Care

    We feel honored to help someone through the toughest time they will ever go through.

  • Personalized Approach

    At Hester Law Group, we use a personal approach that best suits the needs of our clients.

  • Unparalleled Experience

    We have been a successful team for two decades and have over 130 years of combined experience.

We're Available 24/7

Get Started on Your Defense Today
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.