Washington Legal Defense
Free Consultation
Prior Testimony Admitted In Retrial Get 150+ Years of Combined Litigation Experience on Your Side
Hester Law Group

Prior Testimony Admitted in Retrial

Recently, in Pierce County Superior Court, I was involved in a retrial of an attempted first- degree murder wherein the victim was rendered a quadriplegic from an assault with the issue revolving on the identity of the attacker. The initial trial resulted in a split of 9-3 for acquittal but the prosecution exercised its right to have a second trial after my client rejected a proposed plea to fourth degree assault with no time.

At the outset, the prosecution indicated that it would use a transcript of my client’s testimony from the first trial read to the jury. After researching the law it appeared that this was a proper procedure. See Harrison v. United States, 392 U.S. 219, 88 S.Ct. 2000, 20 L.Ed.2d 1047 (1960); United States v. Grunewald, 164 F.Supp. 644 (1958).

The Grunewald case does speak to the principle of “verbal completeness,” meaning that if part of the testimony is to be admitted, then the entire transcript (at the defendant’s request) should be admitted minus any material that was improperly admitted in the first trial. The next question then is how to have the prior testimony presented to the jury. The prosecution called one of its colleagues to have the actual testimony read as if he were my client testifying on the stand. Also, the defense was given the option of reading the questions it had asked in the first trial as opposed to having another individual from the prosecutor’s office read the question. After deliberating a considerable amount on the best method in which to do this, the defense decided to read the questions it had asked in the first trial.

I remain conflicted as to whether this was the best procedure, but ultimately we decided it was better to control the verbalization of the question. If others have encountered this situation I would welcome suggestions as to other options. Additionally, because we wanted the jury to hear our client’s voice, he testified (again) in our case-in-chief, although the breadth of his testimony was lessened because the jury had already “heard” his rendition.

After a two-week trial, the jury took four hours to acquit my client in the second trial. Now, the only thing that remains is the civil case.

Categories
  • Washington Association for Justice
  • The National Trial Lawyers Top 100
  • Tacoma-Pierce County Bar Association
  • American Board of Trial Advocates
  • American Association for Justice
  • Washington State Bar Association
  • Avvo 10.0 Rating

Success Stories

  • If he said he was going to do something he did it. He has integrity.

    “Wayne Fricke is a terrific lawyer who knows the law. The following are only several of many ways Mr. Fricke supported me during my time of crisis: 1. Explained the charges against me in a manner that ...”

    - Former Client
  • He always exceeds expectations.

    “Mr. Fricke has been our family lawyer for about 5 years. He has done an amazing job representing my family and I. He always exceeds expectations and informs us on everything going on.”

    - Jen
  • He, at no time, treated me as though I was guilty.

    “I was accused of domestic violence and need a Lawyer to defend me. Not knowing who to hire I started with Mr. K.W. This lawyer did not seem to believe in my innocence and I was looking at 3 to 5 ...”

    - Craig
  • Mr. Fricke had his office call me weekly for updates.

    “A few years ago, I was involved in a car accident. Due to my injuries, I hired an attorney who seemingly disappeared. I was in crisis after calling the court and finding out my case had been dismissed ...”

    - Sharyl
  • He is always honest and straight forward.

    “I hired Lance Hester to help me with 2 different legal matters. One was a felony criminal case and the other was a family law issue. In the felony criminal case this individual had everything to lose ...”

    - Former Client
/

Proven Results

  • Reduced Sentence Drug Crime
  • Case Dismissed Domestic Violence
  • Four Felony Charges Dismissed Four Felony Counts
  • Reduced Sentence Drug Distribution
  • Vacated Conviction 4th Degree Assault
  • Case Dismissed Possession of Stolen Property
  • Two Restraining Orders Granted Anti-harassment Orders
  • Federal Court Success Federal Probation Violation
  • Case Dismissed Rape
  • Life Sentence Avoided Federal Criminal Sex Charges
/

Why Choose the Hester Law Group?

  • Accessible to Clients

    We understand the urgency clients have when they need an attorney. We are available  24/7 to help you.

  • We Truly Care

    We feel honored to help someone through the toughest time they will ever go through.

  • Personalized Approach

    At Hester Law Group, we use a personal approach that best suits the needs of our clients.

  • Unparalleled Experience

    We have been a successful team for two decades and have over 130 years of combined experience.

We're Available 24/7

Get Started on Your Defense Today
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.