Washington Legal Defense
Free Consultation
Witness Unavailability By Coercion Get 150+ Years of Combined Litigation Experience on Your Side
Hester Law Group

Witness Unavailability by Coercion

Over the last couple of years the United States Supreme Court has decided two cases that originated within our state involving the admissibility of hearsay evidence in contravention of the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution. Davis v. Washington, 126 S.Ct. 2266 (2006); Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). Both of these cases held that the admission of testimony of a witness who did not appear at trial is barred by the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment if the witness was unavailable and the defendant has not had a prior opportunity for cross examination. The Davis opinion also defined what is considered testimonial and non-testimonial statements, stating:

Statements are non-testimonial when made in the course of police interrogation under circumstances objectively indicating that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to enable police assistance to meet an ongoing emergency. Their testimony when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no such ongoing emergency, They are testimonial when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no such ongoing emergency and that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

Davis at 2273-74.

The defense bar has viewed these cases as an affirmation of our constitutional rights, while the prosecution has considered them detrimental to the prosecution of cases involving domes- tic violence and child sexual assault cases.

However, while rereading the cases, there was one aspect of the Davis case that caught my attention. Specifically, in response to government concerns, the Court indicated that the defense would not necessarily be given a windfall if a witness failed to appear. As the Supreme Court stated:

...When defendants seek to undermine the judicial process by procuring or coercing silence from witnesses and victims, the Sixth Amendment does not require courts to acquiesce. While defendants have no duty to assist the state in proving their guilt, they do have the duty to refrain from acting in ways that destroy the integrity of the criminal trial system. We reiterate what we said in Crawford: That “the rule of forfeiture by wrongdoing...extinguishes confrontation claims on essentially equitable grounds.”

Davis at 2280.

I did some additional research to determine how many times this doctrine has been cited in appellate court cases in the State of Washington as well as the federal circuits. FRE 804(b)(6), which was adopted in 1997 incorporates the common law rule. In Washington, ER 804(a)(6) sets forth the rule. I found no cases in the State of Washington. I only found ten appellate cases from five circuits that cited to the federal rule. The case of U.S. v. Stribbling, 405 F.3d 227 (4th Cir. 2005), addresses the history of the rule. It noted that by 1996 all of the circuits that had addressed the issue had recognized the doctrine. See United States v. Houlihan, 92 F.3d at 1271, (1st Cir. 1996); United States v. Mastrangelo, 693 F.2d 269, (2nd Cir. 1982); Steal v. Taylor, 684 F.2d 1193 (6th Cir. 1982); United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616 (5th Cir. 1982); United States v. Balano, 618 F.2d 624 (10th Cir. 1979); United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, (8th Cir. 1976).

Categories
  • Washington Association for Justice
  • The National Trial Lawyers Top 100
  • Tacoma-Pierce County Bar Association
  • American Board of Trial Advocates
  • American Association for Justice
  • Washington State Bar Association
  • Avvo 10.0 Rating

Success Stories

  • If he said he was going to do something he did it. He has integrity.

    “Wayne Fricke is a terrific lawyer who knows the law. The following are only several of many ways Mr. Fricke supported me during my time of crisis: 1. Explained the charges against me in a manner that ...”

    - Former Client
  • He always exceeds expectations.

    “Mr. Fricke has been our family lawyer for about 5 years. He has done an amazing job representing my family and I. He always exceeds expectations and informs us on everything going on.”

    - Jen
  • He, at no time, treated me as though I was guilty.

    “I was accused of domestic violence and need a Lawyer to defend me. Not knowing who to hire I started with Mr. K.W. This lawyer did not seem to believe in my innocence and I was looking at 3 to 5 ...”

    - Craig
  • Mr. Fricke had his office call me weekly for updates.

    “A few years ago, I was involved in a car accident. Due to my injuries, I hired an attorney who seemingly disappeared. I was in crisis after calling the court and finding out my case had been dismissed ...”

    - Sharyl
  • He is always honest and straight forward.

    “I hired Lance Hester to help me with 2 different legal matters. One was a felony criminal case and the other was a family law issue. In the felony criminal case this individual had everything to lose ...”

    - Former Client
/

Proven Results

  • Reduced Sentence Drug Crime
  • Case Dismissed Domestic Violence
  • Four Felony Charges Dismissed Four Felony Counts
  • Reduced Sentence Drug Distribution
  • Vacated Conviction 4th Degree Assault
  • Case Dismissed Possession of Stolen Property
  • Two Restraining Orders Granted Anti-harassment Orders
  • Federal Court Success Federal Probation Violation
  • Case Dismissed Rape
  • Life Sentence Avoided Federal Criminal Sex Charges
/

Why Choose the Hester Law Group?

  • Accessible to Clients

    We understand the urgency clients have when they need an attorney. We are available  24/7 to help you.

  • We Truly Care

    We feel honored to help someone through the toughest time they will ever go through.

  • Personalized Approach

    At Hester Law Group, we use a personal approach that best suits the needs of our clients.

  • Unparalleled Experience

    We have been a successful team for two decades and have over 130 years of combined experience.

We're Available 24/7

Get Started on Your Defense Today
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.