Washington Legal Defense
Free Consultation
Cat's Out of the Bag Get 150+ Years of Combined Litigation Experience on Your Side
Hester Law Group

Cat's Out of the Bag

Recently we have seen police practices that include an officer who has developed a suspicion of criminal activity engaging the suspect while in custody (not free to leave) in pre- Miranda questioning, including eliciting incriminating statements followed by searches which produced evidence. These pre-Miranda activities are followed by the giving of Miranda warnings and the request to search and informing the suspect of his right to stop the search unless a warrant is obtained. The defendant then gives the same incriminating information, plus, and consents to the search followed by charges that relate to the evidence obtained via the incriminating statements and the discovered evidence.

This practice is not legal. Washington v. Lavaris, 99 Wn2d 851, 664 P2d 1234, 1983 Wash.

While defendant was held in jail awaiting trial for first-degree murder, two detectives offered to take defendant across the street to their office to talk about the murder. Defendant indicated he was willing to talk because he did not want somebody else to get in trouble for something he did. Forty-five minutes later, defendant was informed of his Miranda rights in both Spanish and English but was not advised this pre-Mirada confession could not be used against him. Defendant gave a detailed account of his participation in the murder. The trial court suppressed the pre-Miranda oral statement, admitted the post-Miranda written statement, and convicted defendant for murder. The lower appellate court affirmed. On appeal, the court reversed. The court held that defendant’s post-Miranda statement was inadmissible because there was no break in the causative chain nor was there some other insulating factor after the tainted and inadmissible pre-Miranda statement. The Miranda warnings did not remove the constitutional infirmity from any post-Miranda statements. After defendant let the cat out of the bag with his oral confession, the subsequent Miranda warnings had little significance.

That outcome is going to occur absent the presence of an insulating factor which separates the pre-Miranda confession from any subsequent statement.

In this case, the post-Miranda statements followed immediately after the pre-Miranda incriminating statement and the custodial setting did not change, nor did the defendant con- sult with an attorney following the recitation of his Miranda rights.

The cat couldn’t be put back in the bag in 1983, nor can it now.

Categories
  • Washington Association for Justice
  • The National Trial Lawyers Top 100
  • Tacoma-Pierce County Bar Association
  • American Board of Trial Advocates
  • American Association for Justice
  • Washington State Bar Association
  • Avvo 10.0 Rating

Success Stories

  • If he said he was going to do something he did it. He has integrity.

    “Wayne Fricke is a terrific lawyer who knows the law. The following are only several of many ways Mr. Fricke supported me during my time of crisis: 1. Explained the charges against me in a manner that ...”

    - Former Client
  • He always exceeds expectations.

    “Mr. Fricke has been our family lawyer for about 5 years. He has done an amazing job representing my family and I. He always exceeds expectations and informs us on everything going on.”

    - Jen
  • He, at no time, treated me as though I was guilty.

    “I was accused of domestic violence and need a Lawyer to defend me. Not knowing who to hire I started with Mr. K.W. This lawyer did not seem to believe in my innocence and I was looking at 3 to 5 ...”

    - Craig
  • Mr. Fricke had his office call me weekly for updates.

    “A few years ago, I was involved in a car accident. Due to my injuries, I hired an attorney who seemingly disappeared. I was in crisis after calling the court and finding out my case had been dismissed ...”

    - Sharyl
  • He is always honest and straight forward.

    “I hired Lance Hester to help me with 2 different legal matters. One was a felony criminal case and the other was a family law issue. In the felony criminal case this individual had everything to lose ...”

    - Former Client
/

Proven Results

  • Reduced Sentence Drug Crime
  • Case Dismissed Domestic Violence
  • Four Felony Charges Dismissed Four Felony Counts
  • Reduced Sentence Drug Distribution
  • Vacated Conviction 4th Degree Assault
  • Case Dismissed Possession of Stolen Property
  • Two Restraining Orders Granted Anti-harassment Orders
  • Federal Court Success Federal Probation Violation
  • Case Dismissed Rape
  • Life Sentence Avoided Federal Criminal Sex Charges
/

Why Choose the Hester Law Group?

  • Accessible to Clients

    We understand the urgency clients have when they need an attorney. We are available  24/7 to help you.

  • We Truly Care

    We feel honored to help someone through the toughest time they will ever go through.

  • Personalized Approach

    At Hester Law Group, we use a personal approach that best suits the needs of our clients.

  • Unparalleled Experience

    We have been a successful team for two decades and have over 130 years of combined experience.

We're Available 24/7

Get Started on Your Defense Today
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.